Keep the source close.
A strategy claim should lead back to the ads, destinations, and classified signals that support it.
Why we are building this
That makes public campaign activity one of the clearest records of what a company is actively trying to make the market believe.
A competitor's website explains the company. Its advertising reveals the arguments it chooses to repeat.
Across enough ads and destinations, those arguments form a system: audience, pain, promise, proof, offer, and journey.
Competitor Radar makes that system visible and useful to the marketers planning the next move.
Product principles
The product earns trust by preserving the connection between source evidence, repeated pattern, and strategic interpretation.
A strategy claim should lead back to the ads, destinations, and classified signals that support it.
Observed facts, inferred patterns, and unknown private data must remain visibly different.
The output should sharpen a position, campaign hypothesis, brief, monitoring priority, or test.
The build path
We are completing depth before breadth: a working LinkedIn intelligence system first, then new platform surfaces and the shared strategy layer.
Public ad collection, landing-page enrichment, campaign classification, analytics, strategy synthesis, and quality review.
Native platform signals organized through the same company, campaign, message, funnel, offer, and proof taxonomy.
A unified competitor record showing how the same company changes its creative, message, offer, and journey by platform.
Who we want to build with
Builder / Marketer / Operator
San Francisco + Beijing
Built by Daniel Liu
Daniel is a growth and demand generation marketer whose work spans paid media, ABM, marketing operations, automation, and applied AI. Competitor Radar comes from the recurring work behind real campaigns: collecting market evidence, turning it into a usable point of view, and aligning media, messaging, creative, and operations around the next decision.